Skip to main content
Farzan Law legal article

Home / Blog

Legal update

CCM Super Tacks X Hockey Helmet Incident: 12-Year-Old Suffers Severe Ear Laceration

October 23, 2026

October 6, 2026 — A recent incident involving a CCM Super Tacks X hockey helmet has raised serious safety concerns after a 12-year-old competitive youth hockey player sustained a significant ear laceration during a tournament game. The incident, which occurred on September 5, 2026, highlights potential risks associated with the design and interaction of helmet components during impact.

Product Details

Brand Name: CCM
Manufacturer: CCM Hockey U.S., Inc.
Model: CCM Super Tacks X Senior Black Small (identifier 45351-2)
Retailer: Hockey Monkey
Incident Report Number: 20260916-AD3B2-2147309839
Farzan Law Serving Clients Across California

Incident Overview

On September 5, 2026, a 12-year-old competitive youth hockey player was participating in a sanctioned tournament game. She was wearing her CCM Super Tacks X hockey helmet, fitted with a face cage, when a hockey puck struck the left side of her helmet. Immediately following the impact, she experienced significant bleeding from her left ear.

Initial emergency department records indicated that the hockey puck struck the helmet’s plastic ear covering, causing the ear laceration. She was subsequently transferred for evaluation and repair by a pediatric Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) specialist. The ENT physician diagnosed a 3 cm full-thickness laceration that extended completely through her left pinna (outer ear).

Upon examining the injury, the ENT physician documented a critical observation: “On evaluation it appears that the lesion occurred posterior to anterior likely caused by the inferior aspect of her helmet being pushed through her pinna.” This suggests that the helmet’s own components, specifically the rigid plastic in the ear area, may have contributed to or even caused the laceration upon impact.

The injury required extensive medical treatment, including wound irrigation, a layered surgical closure, and the placement of an auricular bolster. Following her return home, she required additional emergency and ENT treatment, including replacement of the bolster and continued antibiotic therapy. Within approximately 36 hours of the incident, the young player required treatment at three different hospitals across two states. As a result of the injury, she was unable to complete the tournament and has been sidelined from hockey activities during her recovery. The family has preserved the helmet in its post-incident condition and has provided game video, photographs of the helmet and injury, and medical documentation for investigation.

Safety Concerns

This incident raises significant safety concerns regarding the potential interaction between protective helmet components and the wearer’s anatomy during an impact.

  • Immediate Dangers: The primary concern is the risk of the helmet’s rigid ear-area component causing a severe laceration or other traumatic injury to the ear, rather than solely providing protection from external forces. This can lead to immediate pain, significant bleeding, and the need for urgent medical intervention.
  • Long-Term Risks: A full-thickness ear laceration can have long-term consequences, including disfigurement, scarring, infection risk, and potential psychological impact on young athletes. The recovery process can be prolonged, impacting their ability to participate in sports and daily activities.
  • Who Might Be Affected: Competitive youth hockey players, particularly those in age groups where puck speeds are increasing, are at risk. Helmets that are designed with rigid ear protection components, if not properly engineered or tested for all impact scenarios, could pose similar risks to other users. The incident specifically highlights how the helmet’s own structure might become a hazard under certain impact conditions.
  • Property Damage Potential: In this specific incident, there was no report of property damage other than the helmet itself being damaged. However, the primary concern is severe personal injury.

The reported incident suggests that the design or behavior of the helmet’s ear-area component during an impact may have contributed to the severity of the injury, warranting a thorough investigation into whether this design could present a similar injury risk to other hockey players.

What Consumers Should Do

If you own a CCM Super Tacks X hockey helmet or similar models with rigid ear protection, consider the following actions:

  • Inspect Your Helmet: Carefully examine the ear protection components of your helmet for any signs of damage, cracks, or unusual wear. Ensure all parts are securely attached and that there are no sharp edges or deformities that could cause injury.
  • Ensure Proper Fit: Always ensure that hockey helmets are properly fitted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A helmet that is too loose or too tight may not offer optimal protection and could potentially shift during impact, exacerbating risks.
  • Monitor for Unusual Behavior: Pay close attention to how your helmet performs during play. If you experience any discomfort, shifting, or perceive any issues with the ear protection area, discontinue use and have it inspected by a qualified professional.
  • Report Incidents: If you or someone you know experiences a similar incident or injury while wearing this product or any other protective equipment, it is crucial to report it. You can file an incident report with the manufacturer and relevant consumer product safety commissions (e.g., U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission). This helps authorities identify potential safety trends and initiate investigations.
  • Preserve Evidence: If an incident occurs, preserve the product in its post-incident condition, document injuries with photographs, and gather any relevant medical records or game footage.

Manufacturer’s Response

CCM Hockey U.S., Inc. has indicated a response to this incident report. Specific details of their response and any actions they may be taking are currently pending investigation into the reported incident. We will provide updates as more information becomes available.

Legal Help Available

If you or a loved one has been injured by a defective product or suffered property damage due to a product malfunction, you may be entitled to compensation. The experienced product liability attorneys at Farzan Law understand the complexities of defective product cases and can help you navigate the legal process. Farzan Law is a California based Personal Injury law firm focusing on protecting the rights of those wrongfully injured.

Licensed to practice law ONLY in California.

Contact us today for a free consultation: 424-325-3112

Our legal team has successfully represented clients in product liability cases involving defective appliances, automotive defects, medical devices, and consumer products. We work on a contingency fee basis, which means you don’t pay unless we win your case.

Note: This information is based on incident reports provided by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. If you find information that is incorrect, please contact us immediately so we can correct the post to reflect accurate information.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this post is not intended to be legal or medical advice. This article is based on publicly available incident reports. The incidents mentioned have not necessarily been independently verified or adjudicated.

Free consultation

Tell us about your case.

Confidential, no cost, no obligation. You will speak with a lawyer, not a call center.

(424) 325-3112 info@farzanlaw.com

10940 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 2010
Los Angeles, CA 90024